June 8, 2006
Sirnea retouching?
Alin Neamtu wrote this post at 12:21 am:
Topical issues. Start it, pour-les-connaisseurs ...
Take a piece RAW image. Enter the RAW editor. Amend exposure well out front. Save JPG. Amend in new exposure (possibly a bit of contrast, saturation) as well leave the sky. The second piece saves JPG. Place pieces in PS. Select the piece you see sky, Copy-Paste over the other. Then Quick Mask, Gradient Fill, apply gradient to taste. It goes in normal mode, Layer, Layer Mask, Reveal (or) Hide Selection.
Sirnea? Or not? We come and we as in this example? click for example
It matters how you made a picture? Or just the end result?
I am convinced that the debate is on.
(This is not a blog and the images are not retouched)
Category: Nature
3 Comments
3 Responses to "Sirnea retouching?"
Post Reply
«« old friends | If you »»
June 8th, 2006 at 12:29 am
I think both counts ... and how it was done and it exits the final image by minute, hour processing. I do not think a picture, you can remove poor image repeat such views. Eye, hand and imagination ...
It seems that Sirnea brought us all to a certain satisfaction on landscape plan. Nice work!
July 19th, 2006 at 12:24 am
Photos of exception. Last is superb. Congratulations!
ps. final result (my
)
August 19th, 2010 at 2:08 pm
Very good imagii-postcards